By Andrew Gilligan
Published: 10:16PM GMT 07 Mar 2010:
Telegraph.co.uk
British journalists and TV crews are to be banned from the Afghan front line    once a date for the election has been set, while senior officers will be    prohibited from making public speeches and talking to reporters.  
MoD websites will also be “cleansed” of any “non-factual” material including    anything containing troops’ opinions of the war, according to a memo leaked    to The Daily Telegraph.
The edict comes as Gordon Brown was accused of using British troops as    “political props” by visiting Afghanistan the day after giving evidence to    the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq War. 
The war in Afghanistan is likely to be a sensitive political issue in the    election campaign.  
Last night the MoD confirmed a British soldier, from A Company 4 Rifles, was    killed in a fire-fight yesterday bringing the total deaths since the    conflict began to 271.
  
The Prime Minister has been repeatedly accused by former military chiefs of    denying soldiers vital equipment. 
In the memo, Nick Gurr, the MoD’s director of media and communications, says    “embeds” for all British news broadcasters and national journalists will be    prohibited during the campaign, expected to begin later this month.
Embeds, where the reporter lives in a military unit or base, are the only safe    way to cover the fighting. Foreign and local journalists will, however, be    continue to be granted such access, the memo says. 
The MoD ruling comes despite the fact that up to 4,000 British troops - and a    further 10,000 Americans and Afghans - are in the middle of the UK’s largest    full-scale combat operation for seven years.
Operation Moshtarak, which aims to clear Taliban strongholds, is now in its    fourth week and is soon to enter a new phase which could see significant    British casualties. The only information provided on the operations during    the election, however, will be through MoD briefings in Whitehall.
Government departments traditionally curtail their activities during an    election campaign, a period known as “purdah”.  
But there is no precedent for journalists being excluded from the battlefront    for such a long period during operations of such significance. In the run-up    to previous election campaigns, British military activity was at a    relatively low ebb.
The prohibition on public speeches by senior officers is likely to be seen as    a response to the increasing outspokenness of military chiefs, something    also not seen in previous pre-election periods. 
Beginning with the then head of the Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, in    2006, senior personnel have openly pointed out the tension between the work    the Armed Forces are expected to do and the resources provided to carry it    out.
Mr Gurr says that allowing journalists to report from the frontline during the    election “could call into question [the forces’] political impartiality or    give rise to the criticism that public resources are being used for party    political purposes.” 
But the order has led to accusations that the government wants to hide the    true picture of the war in Afghanistan from voters.
Liam Fox, the shadow defence secretary, said he would table an emergency    question in the House of Commons demanding an explanation on Monday. 
“Given the recent visit of the Prime Minister, this is a bad joke,” he said.    “There is clearly one rule for Gordon Brown, when he wants to use the armed    forces as political props, and another for reporters who want to tell the    public what is being done in their name.
“It’s a truth blackout. Nothing, especially the truth, is to stand in the way    in Brown’s election. Our armed forces can fight and die, but not write or    speak. Any critics of the Government are to be banned from having any    contact with the press. This is the grotesque endgame of New Labour. They    want to bury bad news and bury the truth.” 
Colonel Douglas Young, chairman of the British Armed Forces Federation,    expressed “surprise” at the decision.
“It didn’t happen in 1945 - there was no question of limiting reporting at    that time simply because an election was happening and I don’t see why there    should be any questions of that now. Are we to stop operations during this    period? Obviously not, and if operations are in process they should be    reported upon in the normal way.
“It is ridiculous to expect the forces to be hiding away just because there’s    a general election.” 
Cdr John Muxworthy, chief executive of the UK National Defence Association,    said: “To put a situation in place where the press is effectively going to    be gagged, so it is not going to possible for people to see the real news    from the front line, is incredible.
“Afghanistan is not a political issue - it’s a matter of national importance,”    he added. 
Col Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, said: “It    is wrong to gag the media, which is what this is. This is a critical    campaign and the public have a right to be told what is happening. 
“It is also wrong to prevent senior officers speaking.”  
Gordon Brown has received considerable personal criticism for the way he    funded the Armed Forces during his time as Chancellor.
Former chiefs directly contradicted the Prime Minister’s claim at the Chilcot    inquiry that the Forces had been given everything they asked for. 
Lieutenant-General Sir Graeme Lamb, former director of special forces, told    The Daily Telegraph last week that the Armed Forces were “doomed” and were    “clearly in decline,” while General Lord Guthrie, former chief of the    defence staff, said that Mr Brown had been “disingenuous”.
Mr Gurr’s memo, written last week, is entitled “Purdah - Key Principles for    Defence Communicators.”   
It details a string of steps the MoD is taking to minimise the chance of    embarrassing disclosures. Information on MoD and armed forces websites, it    says, must be “cleansed.” Offical blogs and websites must “report factual    information only”.
Even internal MoD and service journals, Mr Gurr says, must be “submitted for    approval before publication” with “controversial issues avoided” because    “these get into the public domain.” 
An MoD spokesman said: “During the period between an election being called and    taking place, communications activity across government is considerably    constrained by the need to be fair to all political parties.
“The MOD recognises that it is vital to continue to tell the public about the    efforts and achievements of our forces in Afghanistan during this period and    has agreed principles with the Cabinet Office that allow this.”
================================================================
Is there no end to the measures Gordon Brown will take to hang on to power?
Was WW2 a political issue?
Was the Falklands conflict a political issue?
Was the invasion of Iraq a political issue?
I consider any war my country is involved in a very important issue in a general election and want to hear waht EVERY partys policy is on the subject. I DO NOT want the issue 'hushing up' and be told what the important issues are.